Our Methodology

Our methodology combines OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) and HUMINT (Human Intelligence) as two complementary information perspectives. Technical analysis, systematic source evaluation and the classification of human information and real-world interactions form a structured foundation. Every step follows clear quality standards, so that information is not merely collected but verified, analysed and evaluated in its context in a traceable way.

At CIP Analytics®, we understand OSINT as the systematic analysis of publicly accessible sources, such as media, specialist publications and official registers. In doing so, we only work with lawfully available information and do not circumvent access restrictions.

At CIP Analytics®, we understand HUMINT as open, voluntary conversations with individuals who have relevant expertise. We work transparently and without deception, and we do not seek confidential business secrets.

Our Commitment to Quality

For us, quality means precision, neutrality and a clear structure. Every analysis is carefully reviewed, methodically documented and prepared to provide decision-makers with reliable guidance. We assess the evidential value of the information used transparently, clearly distinguish verifiable facts, observations and analytical assessments, and explicitly identify the limitations of the available evidence.

How We Work

CIP Analytics® works according to a structured, multi-stage analysis process. From the initial question through research and information gathering to the evaluation and presentation of the results, information is systematically verified and cross-checked. Depending on the objective of the investigation, we combine publicly available information with insights from human sources.

01. Assignment & Research Question

At the outset, we clarify the request, the objectives and the relevant context. Together we determine which question is to be investigated and what scope of analysis is required.

OUTCOME
A clear research question and a defined scope of analysis.

02. Research & Information Gathering

We research publicly available sources and, where the question requires it, draw on information from human sources and real-world interactions. The information gathered is recorded and checked for its relevance to the question.

OUTCOME
An organised information base tied to the research question.

03. Source Evaluation & Plausibility Check

The sources used are checked for origin, evidential value and plausibility. Contradictions and anomalies are identified and taken into account in the further analysis.

OUTCOME
Evaluated information, classified in a traceable way.

04. Analysis & Correlation

The information gathered is put into relation and systematically analysed. Relevant connections, points of agreement and discrepancies are worked out and classified according to their significance for the research question.

OUTCOME
Identified connections and structured analytical results.

05. Contextualisation & Risk Assessment

The analytical results are placed in the relevant factual and temporal context. Possible risks, developments and anomalies are assessed with regard to their significance.

OUTCOME
Contextualised findings and a well-reasoned risk assessment.

06. Presentation & Results

The key findings are condensed and clearly presented. The results are set out in a clear form and summarised as a reliable basis for further evaluations and decisions.

OUTCOME
Clear, traceable and decision-relevant findings.

We document the legal and official foundations of our research on the page Regulatory & Legal Sources.

© 2026 CIP Analytics® – Structure builds trust.